Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Enter the vehicle green tax

I thought I should post this article from Autodealer.co.za, since from tomorrow the vehicle emission tax will be kicking in. So, if you are thinking of buying the car tomorrow, why not buy it today, especially if the car you intend buying is a big polluter?

Wednesday sees the introduction of the CO2 vehicle emissions (green) tax which will have a significant price and insurancae cost impact on consumers opting for the more luxury double cab and 4×4 models.
The South African government has made clear its intention to introduce environmental taxes and incentives to ensure that our economic growth is directed towards a more sustainable path.
In the 2009 Budget, the Minister of Finance announced a reform of the ad valorem excise duty on motor vehicles (both motor cars and light commercial vehicles) to include a CO2 emissions component.
This was in line with an earlier proposal by the then Department of Minerals and Energy (in 2004) to encourage the use of more fuel efficient vehicles through the taxation of ‘gas guzzlers’, meaning vehicles with a high engine capacity such as double cabs and 4×4s which are not fuel efficient.
Research also indicated close correlations between vehicle engine size, fuel efficiency, and CO2 emissions.
It is in this context that the 2009 Budget proposal to tax vehicle CO2 emissions was framed.
After consultation with the National Association of Automobile Manufacturers of South Africa (NAAMSA), it was agreed that the implementation of the proposed vehicle CO2 emissions tax would be delayed and reformed into a specific tax.

Amendment taking effect next Tuesday
This amendment was announced in the 2010 Budget, to take effect on 1 September this year. The industry also requested that the tax be limited to passenger vehicles because there was no data on CO2 emissions by light commercial vehicles, which is why the 2010 Budget Review only refers to passenger vehicles.
It was always the intention that the definition of passenger vehicles would include double cabs and by inference small bakkies because these are often used as passenger vehicles.
The one legal hurdle was that the harmonised code of classification in terms of the Customs and Excise Act, under whose umbrella the CO2 emissions tax is being implemented, defines double cabs (4X4) and some smaller bakkies as light commercial vehicles.

The VAT Act partially addresses this problem by defining a passenger vehicle as including ‘a motor car, station wagon, minibus, double cab light delivery vehicle and any other motor vehicle of a kind normally used on public roads, which has three or more wheels and is constructed or converted wholly or mainly for the carriage of passengers.
Since it was not possible to use VAT definition of a passenger car for the purpose of implementing CO2 emissions tax under the umbrella of the Customs and Excise Act, National Treasury decided to include in the definition of a passenger car all categories of light commercial vehicles, as defined in the harmonised code of classification, but excluding light trucks.

The motor industry has objected to the inclusion of double cabs and small bakkies as passenger vehicles in the proposed vehicle CO2 emissions tax net.
The industry argues that these vehicles are classified as light commercial vehicles which should be excluded from the CO2 vehicle emissions tax.
In addition, the industry says that emissions data for light commercial vehicles are not available.

Treasury response
National Treasury has always intended to include double cab vehicles in the first phase of the implementation of the CO2 vehicle emissions tax.
This is in line with the intent of the VAT Act and the fact that double cabs are mainly used as passenger vehicles.
Including double cabs in the CO2 vehicle emissions tax net is also in line with the original intent of this proposed tax: the taxation of high engine capacity vehicles to discourage the use of vehicles not fuel efficient and encourage the shift to the more fuel efficient ones.
In addition, the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications, a subsidiary of the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), has also confirmed that data on CO2 emissions expressed as g/km is available for all vehicles.
It is also possible to calculate a vehicle’s CO2 emissions based on its engine size.
Since most small single cab bakkies and their double cab equivalents have similar engine sizes, these two categories of vehicles should be treated the same for the purpose of the vehicle CO2 emissions tax.
Against this background, the request by the industry to exclude double cabs and small bakkies from the vehicle CO2 emissions tax can therefore not be accepted.

Tax administration
The CO2 vehicle emissions tax will be collected and paid over to the South African Revenue Services by the vehicle manufactures and /or importers.
A part (or all) of the CO2 vehicle emissions tax is thus likely to be built into the price the manufacturer or importer charges their clients. It will be good practice if dealers could reflect on the invoices to their clients the CO2 emissions of each vehicle and the estimated total CO2 emissions tax.

• The tax will be levied at R75 per g/km on vehicles emitting more than 120 g/km CO2.
• According to McCarthy CEO Brand Pretorius, South Africa is unique in an international context because it is the only country that is imposing a carbon tax on light commercial vehicles from 1 September.
• The proposed tax would add about R10 000 to R20 000 to the price of a light commercial vehicle, depending on the model.
More vehicle owners opt for these vehicles and their reasons include:
* They are more spacious/comfortable;
* Being higher, they offer better visibility;
* They can go anywhere, which suits outdoor SA lifestyles;
* They are seen as safer for their occupants in a crash;
* They can ride the potholes better – road conditions off the main roads have deteriorated;
* They equal or exceed the luxury of the best saloon cars;
* They convey an adventurous “tough guy” image.
The CO2 emissions tax might now add a significant amount to the purchase price of these vehicles – making it more expensive not only to buy, but also to insure. One can expect further consultation between the motoring manufacturing industry and the Treasury, but – whatever the outcome – vehicle owners would have to be sensitive to not only what vehicle they purchase, but also how they go about insuring this vehicle.

Source: http://www.autodealer.co.za/zululand/?p=1165

No comments: